|
|
|
|
|
July 19, 2009 -
Pentecost 7
Without Distinctions
"For Christ is our peace... he has made the two groups into one
and has broken down the dividing wall, that
is the hostility between us... that he might create... one new
humanity."
(Ephesians 2:14-15)
This building
in which we worship is important to our life as a faith community.
This year is our 35th anniversary and we are going to celebrate it
on September 13th. The
history of our building is beautifully captured in the logo
created for our anniversary celebration.
We know how significant this building is not only for
us, but for others as we share it in many ways with the wider
community. A certain
amount of our identity
(I suspect way too much)
is wrapped up in this building.
I bring this up to emphasize, that as significant as our
building is to us, it pales in comparison to the significance
of the Jerusalem Temple to the biblical Israelites.
In the bible, the temple in Jerusalem was the
absolute center
of Jewish religious and national life.
The identity of the Israelites, their religion and
their nation was inseparably linked to Jerusalem and the
temple. It is very hard, if not impossible, for us to even begin
to grasp the deep seeded emotional, political and religious
investment they had in the Jerusalem temple.
I cannot think of any contemporary parallels in our culture
that even come close in comparison.
To get a sense of the sacredness of Jerusalem and the temple in
biblical times, I quote from the
Midrash
Tanchuma, Qedoshim
a collection of Torah readings and interpretations:
"As the navel is set in the centre of the human body, so is the
land of Israel the navel of the world...
and Jerusalem (is set) in the centre of the land of
Israel; and the sanctuary (temple) (is set) in the centre of
Jerusalem; and the holy place (Holy of Holies) (is set) in the
centre of the sanctuary; and the ark (of the covenant) in the centre
of the holy place, and the foundation stone before the holy place,
because from it the world was created." These words from the
Midrash help
us understand the deep emotional, political and spiritual investment
the people had in the land, in Jerusalem and the temple in biblical
times; an investment still plainly evident in contemporary times.
When we consider that the Palestinian people, from their
perspective, have an equal and parallel sense of deep-seeded
emotional, political and religious investment in the same turf, we
can appreciate the complexities and difficulties of resolving the
contemporary situation of perpetual conflict. The history of the Jerusalem Temple stretches far
back into biblical times, the first temple being built during the
time of Solomon, perhaps 950 BCE, and it lasted until about 587 BCE
when it, along with much of Jerusalem, was destroyed by the
Babylonians, and a period of exile began for the Israelites.
The second temple reconstruction was begun later in that
century under Persian occupation and continued in various stages
stretching into the time of Herod and Jesus.
In about 70 CE it was destroyed again, this time by the
Romans, an event alluded to in the New Testament. The Jerusalem temple was extraordinary and
awesome; a most spectacular building covering some 40 acres.
It was splendid and extravagant - a glorious edifice.
It's very design and layout tells us much about their
religion and how they practiced it. To illustrate that point, I would like to suggest
to the church council this morning, a redesign of our building based
on the design of the ancient Jerusalem temple.
If we are to do the job
right, we would have to make some serious capital improvements, but
since we don't have the money, I will work with what we have.
We can discuss it at our August meeting. My proposal is much simplified compared to
the real thing, but it is still based on the layout of the ancient
temple. Depending on
who you are, you would have your own entrance and your own
space. The
Jerusalem temple had thirteen different entrances, each serving a
specified purpose, and numerous designated spaces for various
groupings of people.
If you are agnostic or atheist your entrance will be at the west end
of the church down the hallway, and your designated space will be
the Fellowship Hall.
If you are non-Lutheran your entrance is the downstairs north
entrance and your space is downstairs. If you are a Lutheran female your door is this
side door over here, and your space is the choir section.
We will need to put some
kind of divider in front of that section to accentuate the division. If you are stricken with the disease of leprosy
or anything else that has designated your status as ritually
unclean, your entrance is the side door of the narthex and your
space is the cry room as to minimize contact with others so that
your state of ritual uncleanliness will
not be passed on to others.
If you are male your entrance is the main
entrance and your space is these seats right here in front of me -
up to the third row from the front.
If you are members of the clergy, your door is
over here through the memorial garden and your space are these front
row seats so you can have easy access to the chancel area where
religious rituals are performed.
If you are the high priest and top dog, (that
would be me) my seat is directly in front, and only I am permitted
to enter the “Holy of Holies” (which is the current sacristy
transformed and now the most sacred space in the whole edifice
because the “Holy of Holies” is where God hangs out; where God is
thought to be most fully present in the world.)
I and only I can only go into the Holy of Holies one day a
year to make appropriate sacrifices for the sins of you all.
There you have it – what our church building might be like if
based on the blueprint of the ancient Jerusalem temple. Did you notice that, by design, there is a built
in sense of relative worth, that the closer you are to the Holy of
Holies the closer you are to God and worth increases; the farther
you are from the holy of holies the farther you are from God and
worth diminishes. And
of course, it is implied that with each designation comes the
appropriate set of prejudicial and condescending attitudes towards
all the other designations: attitudes of relative human worth and
importance, power and status.
My satirical proposal
is made in order to make a crucial point.
If we don't have some kind of understanding of ancient temple
theology in terms that we can understand, then we cannot really
appreciate the totally radical nature of what is really being
declared and proposed in the scripture from Ephesians this morning.
"For Christ is our peace... he has made the two groups into one
and has broken down the dividing wall, that is the hostility between
us... that he might create... one new humanity."
The early followers of Jesus, in those decades after Jesus,
experienced something so extraordinary, so
transforming, so astonishing, and so convicting in
Jesus that they began to reconstruct their community life together
in a radically new way - no longer following accepted religiously
legitimated designations that were physically embodied in temple
worship, design and practice.
"... (Christ) has broken down the dividing wall."
In those times there was
no greater wall than the wall that existed between Jew
and Gentile. This wall
existed not only as an attitudinal and prejudicial wall in the
hearts and minds of people, but a tangible and very
real physical barrier
within the temple itself that promoted hostility: the Gentiles had
their designated space furthest from the Holy of Holies; then the
unclean; then the women; then the men, finally the clergy. The
temple was built with the superstructure of distinction.
But the followers of Jesus in Ephesus were refashioning their
community life; transforming their community life; no longer
according to the old religiously legitimated distinctions, but a new
design based on their experience of Jesus - as one who moved freely
into life and lived as if those distinctions no longer existed.
It was such a radical shift
in thinking, living, being and doing that the author of the letter
to the Ephesians labels it
"a new humanity."
In Christ they were experiencing “a new humanity” – a new way
to be a community; a community shaped and forged around the heart
and mind of Jesus and the vision of Jesus.
Did they do it perfectly?
No! Did they
struggle to follow Jesus and employ the new Jesus paradigm in their
life together? Yes!
Before we get too judgmental of ancient temple theology and
practices – we need to take a long hard look at the communities of
which we are a part. We
may not have the same kind of physical temple as they, but in many
subtle ways we too can live with a similar temple mentality. We can
project the barrier and walls that exist in our hearts and minds on
to the world. Another example: Are not
many of our communities still largely arranged along ethnic, racial,
and economic distinctions fostered and promoted by rules dictated by
developers and zoning laws that can be manipulated to favor some
over others? In many of
the places I have lived, this county no exception, I
have noticed when ideas are introduced that would bring distinctly
different racial, ethnic and economic groups physically closer
together, laments of decreasing property values and other
concerns pierce the
public ear. Is that so
radically different from the distinctions that were cultivated and
fostered in the temple of old?
One of the beautiful things about the Tuesday Community Dinner, that
this congregation has committed itself to, is that it fosters a
community environment where people of differing distinctions sit
down for fellowship and nourishment at the same tables.
For a brief moment in time distinctions are minimized, and as
far as I am concerned, for those moments that space in the
Silverthorne Elk’s Club becomes
“sacred space”
incarnating what the early followers experienced in Jesus and what
the Ephesian community was striving to
emulate in their life together.
A last thought: Some
interpret this Ephesian’s passage
narrowly saying that the experience described here only happens if
everyone believes in Jesus.
I don’t look at it that way since the various expressions and
denominations of Christianity do a more than thorough job of judging
and condemning one another, and are perpetually thinking up new ways
of committing theological violence against one another.
I see this Ephesian passage in a
different way. I see it as a challenge to live the Jesus life; more
as a description of what a Jesus life looks like and the impact it
can have whether it be within a faith community like this one; or
especially in the wider more diverse community; struggling to live
without the temple mentality of dehumanizing distinctions; living
with Jesus’ heart and mind and vision, and in so living creating the
possibility of “a new
humanity.”
Will it be hard? For
sure it will be hard! - especially in the kind of fractured world we
live in; but difficulty of task should never be a rationalization
for lack of effort.
Will it take courage? – absolutely! - for the prejudicial forces
that would prevent Jesus’ life from being embodied in the world are
legion and determined; but capitulation due to cowardice cannot be
our way because it was not Jesus’ way.
Can we be successful?
To me it’s an irrelevant question.
Following Jesus cannot be calculated using the world’s
standards and measurements of success; for when we do we become
manipulating and self-serving. We follow Jesus not to be successful,
but to be faithful to his way; for in following his way we are
given, as a gift, our fullest and most beautiful humanity - and
affirm the fullest and most beautiful humanity of others.
The temple building of biblical times was glorious, but in many
ways, it gloriously legitimated dehumanizing distinctions between
people.
I pray the identity of this faith community will be
inseparably wrapped not with our
building, but be inseparably wrapped with Jesus as we courageously
and tenaciously embody his way of life within our faith community
and labor to bring it to expression in the wider community.
|