|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2009
INTERFACE The computer age
has brought an explosion of new vocabulary and redefinition of old
vocabulary. For example,
not long ago if you had a "blue-tooth" you had better go see a dentist
and quick because you likely had a real problem!
Of course, nowadays half the population has a blue-tooth, not in
their mouths but hanging off one of their ears.
"Windows"
about a decade ago referred to those things we look through made of
glass.
"Windows Vista" just
three years ago would have meant the view we see when we look through
our windows made of glass.
And "Windows 7" just a
few months ago might have loosely referred to the number of banks large
windows made of glass in this worship space that we look through and
behold a great vista of mountain scenery
(count and point
1-2-3-4-5-6-7). But of
course, all of that has changed as "windows" now refers to a series of
barely functional operating systems than run millions of our computers.
(Sorry about the editorial
comment, but I spent the greater part of two days last week reinstalling
my computer operating system, Windows Vista, that crashed!
I could say my "vista" was
grossly obscured last week) Another word
that has taken on new meaning is the word "interface."
"Interface" is an old word that
has a new point of reference specifically referring to the
wires, gadgets, gizmos and accompanying software than connect our all of
our computer devices and contraptions. I want to speak
for a moment about "interface" but not in a technological sense
but in a spiritual sense.
For what we have in this gospel this morning is an astounding
example of "interface" that is far more profound than any
modern technological example or definition of interface.
Interface can be both a noun and a verb.
In fact, one definition of "interface" reads:
"a thing that connects
different and sometime incompatible elements, systems, bodies, spaces,
phases, or human beings." That is interface used as a noun,
"a thing that connects."
As a verb it means:
"to be the agent that
brings together, connects or meshes."
The word
"interface," used both as a noun and a verb, is an appropriate word
to describe today's gospel passage.
For what Jesus, as both noun and a verb, does in this
passage and, for that matter, in the entirety of the gospel of Mark, is
mesh together
these two great tenets of his religion:
loving God and loving
neighbor. And
also, notice the intentional use of incorrect grammar that
seals the deal: "There
is (singular) no other
commandment (singular)
greater than these (plural).
The two are described as singular;
the two are meshed into one!
In response to the scribe's question, Jesus forever meshed, fused,
connected, intertwined, intermingled,
interfaced loving
God and loving neighbor. They are not mutually exclusive, but they
are one reality - they are a shared experience - they both occupy the
same space - they cannot be separated - one cannot be done without the
other.
Loving neighbor is to love
God; loving God is to love the neighbor.
And the space they occupy is the
life of the
person of Jesus. That, for me, is the essence of this thing we call
Christianity. Loving God
and loving neighbor occupied the same space in Jesus' life.
He made no distinction between the two, that is what made his
life so comprehensively remarkable - and Jesus
mentors us in
that experience and in that reality.
He mentors us so that loving God and loving neighbor might
occupy the same space in your life and my life as we are mentored by
Jesus into a deeper experience of what it means to be fully and most
beautifully and profoundly human beings.
He mentors us in
"interface!"
The question
and the challenge that explodes out of this passage today is,
"Will we allow our lives to be
an interface? Will we allow
Jesus to mentor us in loving God and loving neighbor occupying the same
space in our lives: in my life; in your life; and most importantly in
our shared life, in the dynamics of our life together as a community?"
But before we can answer that we need to talk about what that
experience might look
like and be
like; the shape it might take in real life. Jesus said
"love your neighbor as
yourself."
Actually this week, I threw a question out in several places: to the
Wednesday morning Bible study group, to the Thursday evening
Book Study Group and
several other individuals who were fortunate or unfortunate enough
(depending how you look at it) to cross my path this week, and the
question was: "What does it
look like to love neighbor as self?"
We had some great discussions! The bottom line was that we can take "love your neighbor as yourself" and live it and embody it in one of two ways - and they are not the same. Does it mean, loving my neighbor as if my neighbor were like me? OR - Does it mean, loving my neighbor as if I were like my neighbor? Let me repeat that for the difference is subtle yet significant. Do I love my neighbor as if my neighbor were like me? OR - Do I love my neighbor as if I were like my neighbor? If I love my
neighbor the first way, as
if my neighbor were like me, that is very much a kind of
conditional love - a restrictive love.
For it means that the more my neighbor resembles me, the
more I will love my neighbor.
So, in that scenario, I go at my neighbor with an
agenda, and my
agenda is to love my neighbor, yes, but to make my neighbor look
more like me - think more like me - behave more like me -
shape their life to look more like mine - and the more they do,
the more I will love my neighbor.
It's a conditional expression of love and certainly not a very
risky kind of love. For I
am protecting myself in that scenario from really being affected
or changed or transformed in any way by my neighbor.
The goal is to make my neighbor look and be as much like
me as possible; not the other way around. But if I love my
neighbor as if I were like my
neighbor, that is an altogether different thing.
That kind of love is
unconditional. That kind of
love takes my neighbor seriously for who they are.
That expression of love meets my neighbor without an agenda.
That kind of love sees the intrinsic value of my neighbor's life.
That kind of love values my neighbor for who they are.
That kind of love causes me to climb into the skin and soul
of my neighbor and get to know my neighbor, not from afar where I am
safe and unaffected, but from the inside-out!
And when I love like that, I run
the risk that my life may be as transformed and changed by the
relationship as my neighbor's life might be.
As I have
entered into and lived into and invested myself into
the life and the person of Jesus this year, the Jesus of Mark's gospel,
it has been my experience that the latter is the kind of love of
neighbor in which Jesus mentors us.
Jesus loved the neighbor as if he were like the neighbor. Jesus
loved the neighbor knowing the neighbor from the inside-out. Think of the
journey we have taken through Mark' gospel this year, and how Jesus
loved the neighbor. Think
of those who were the recipients of his love and the manner in which he
loved them. His love was
radically and qualitatively and comprehensively different from the
love that the most "religious" people of his time loved with.
The religious people, for the most part, loved with a very
conditional and restrictive love.
They loved with the agenda to make the other look and be
more like them; and not only that but they had a very narrow definition
of who was even to be considered a neighbor.
But not Jesus!
He loved lavishly and
excessively and with abandon; with a love that saw the intrinsic
value in the neighbor no matter who they were.
He radically broadened the
functional definition
of neighbor by loving those that the religious folks didn't even
acknowledge as neighbors and hence not deserving of their love.
Jesus loved the
neighbor with an EMPOWERING
LOVE: that is he loved those who were being crushed under the
weight of the political and religious hierarchy and the systems of
domination that they fostered and cultivated and advanced. He loved and
lifted up those who were subjugated by the powers that be: the poor,
woman, children, Gentiles, marginal peoples of all kinds; people not
even acknowledged as fully human by the powerful. Jesus loved the
neighbor with a LOVE THAT
CONFERRED DIGNITY AND VALIDATION: those deemed religiously
unclean and cut off from the community; those considered as morally
inferior: tax collectors, prostitutes and outcast of all kinds.
He saw things in those people that the religious were blind to.
He came at people with agenda-less love, which is
unconditional love - and as a result people's lives were transformed,
not because Jesus had an agenda he forced on them, but because of his
love that empowered, conferred dignity and validated their humanity. That's what
loving God with all of one's heart, soul, mind and strength looks like
interfaced with loving neighbor as oneself. Last Monday
evening we watched a movie that came out earlier this year entitled,
"The Soloist."
It's based on the true story of Nathanial Ayers, a cello prodigy
with extraordinary talent and skill whose severe schizophrenia landed
him on the skid row streets of Los Angeles after two years at Julliard.
Steve Lopez is a disenchanted journalist for the Los Angeles
Times desperately looking for a story.
By accident, Lopez discovers Ayers on the street playing
beautifully a violin that had only two strings.
Lopez becomes
captivated by Ayers and writes a series of articles that won Lopez
acclaim and gained Ayers and the plight of the homeless in Los Angeles
considerable attention.
Over time the two men formed a relationship that reached a point
of great strain and conflict when Lopez took it upon himself to try to
fix the mentally ill Ayers and improve his life according to his
agenda. It wasn't
until Lopez let go of his personal agenda for the schizophrenic
Ayers to make Ayers into something he could not be, and simply became
his friend in unconditional love that he finally saw the true
humanity of Nathanial Ayers and both of the men underwent what could be
called a degree of personal transformation. For me, that
story captured some of what Jesus meant by
"love your neighbor as
yourself." Somebody asked
me this week, "Why are you a
Christian?" I think
the asker expected me to respond with some kind of an absolutist,
exclusivist answer along the lines of
"because it is the only way to
salvation" or some such narrow thing as that.
But I
do not
subscribe to the parochial concept that the God of the universe can only
be known in one religious expression; or that the world is
simplistically divided up between the saved and the unsaved; those in
and those left-behind; those who have-God and those who do-not-have-God;
that God can only be known in a little God-box of doctrines and beliefs.
Rather, if by
Christian the asker meant
follower of Jesus, then
I am because
it has been my experience and
ever-growing-conviction that in opening up my life to being
mentored by Jesus who interfaces the love of God and love of neighbor, I
am led along a path into unexpected experiences, places and
people where God already
is, and that in loving my neighbor as myself we both,
neighbor and myself, run the
glorious risk of being transformed and made more whole and more
beautifully human by the unconditional love God interfaced in the life
of Jesus: my Mentor, my Counselor, my Guide. Amen.
|