|
|
|
|
spiritualtrailsreflections
Home
|
IMAGE “You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.” Anne Lamott
NOURISHMENT
VIEW
LIGHT WITHIN
QUESTIONS *************
He who thinks he is finished is finished. Those who think they have
arrived have lost their way.
I'll never forget when we brought our infant son David home from the hospital. I remember the first time I laid him down on his changing table to do the diaper thing, and he looked up at me. It was then it hit me, like a ton of bricks, that I was responsible for this tiny, fragile, vulnerable human life. This new little life that was before me wearing dirty diapers was totally vulnerable in every way. Without us he could not survive. His well-being depended on us, young parents with no experience! Infant David was the epitome of vulnerability. Without the swaddling clothes of care, love, nourishment, touch, and protection the infant David would have perished. "And she gave birth to her first-born son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger…" Luke 2:7 The Christian Faith has the audacity to claim, that the God of the universe chose to shed completely the prerogatives of power, prestige and invincibility and express himself in the complete vulnerability of a baby. It's preposterous if you think about at all! We handle our vulnerability by spending a lifetime putting on protective armor, but it is not so with Jesus. Like us, Jesus was born vulnerable, but unlike us for his entire life and ministry he lived without the protective armor we cherish. He was the most alive and whole person that ever lived. His love never turned cynical or bitter or condescending. He never lost his unequivocal trust in God his father, even at his life's most difficult moments. When he was betrayed and denied he responded with grace and forgiveness. He never became numb and indifferent to the need and pain that existed around him. He remained open to those that all others had rejected and written off. The lepers that everybody avoided and feared, he touched becoming ritually unclean himself. The prostitutes and tax collectors that the community scorned, he went out of his way to pursue. The sick and dying, beggars and blind that lay along the streets that most people past by without even noticing, he brought healing and acceptance. In those last final hours when the whole world had turned on him, even his best friends, he was faithful to love's prerogatives to the end speaking the most remarkable words even to be heard, "Father, forgive them." In the stories he told about himself, he was frequently the vulnerable character. He is like the Samaritan who attended to the needs of the man who had been mugged and left to die along the side of the road; ignored by the priest and Levite. (or maybe he most resembled the man in the ditch) He is like the shepherd who is willing to risk the dangers of the wilderness to find the one sheep gone astray. He is like the loving father, who even after his son has left home and made a whole series of devastating sinful choices that yielded compound negative interest, still waits ready to embrace him. All of us have been wounded in some profound way by life, and we bear the marks of those wounds in our souls. Every one of us struggles to cope with all that has happened. We wonder if there is a love in this universe in which we can rest back, be accepted, healed and empowered. I'm here to tell you that there is a love like that that burns for you. There is a heart that beats passionately like that for you. That love is lying in a manger in this vulnerable little child. Don't be afraid. Don't draw back. Come! Take him into your very being! Invite him into your soul. Let him wrap his swaddling clothes of healing grace and forgiveness around your deepest wounds. Lay him in the manger of your heart. Let him love you, heal you, empower you to not be afraid to go and be in the world wrapping the swaddling clothes of His love around others.
Post Election Musing Contrary to what some believe, I believe a political party cannot usher in the kingdom of God. For a party to think it can is the mountaintop of mass self-delusion. I wouldn't go so far to say that the republic was saved on November 7, 2006, but I do think the shift in the balance of power is potentially a healthy development that could change the course of dangerous trends established over the past six years. Since 2000, one party has had control of the executive and legislative branches of the government, a potentially dangerous thing if left unchecked. Since 2000 I have seen troublesome trends emerging. We have record deficits. There has been an epidemic of scandals, dishonesty and lack of truth telling. The constitution, if anything, has been weakened and undermined. The President has attached more "signing statements" to bills than all of the previous presidents combined. Legislation for environmental protection has been relaxed and in some cases not enforced. We have a quagmire of a war that is exacting a huge toll in human life and financial resources. The number of people living in poverty in America, especially among children, has increased. Many social programs have been cut in the name of saving money with total disregard for uncontrolled spending in other areas. Salaries among corporate executives have increased dramatically while the earning power of the average worker has not. We have seen thousands of jobs exported outside of our boundaries. Health care costs are out of control. The country is more polarized than I have seen it since the 1960's. We’ve seen an attitude of self-righteous indignation towards those who disagree with even the patriotism of those who disagree being called into question. There has been a pervasive attitude among the party in power that could be expressed, "It's our way or hit the highway." Even the outgoing Secretary of Defense got in one last shot when he said that no one really understands or appreciates the complexities of the war but he and few others. How arrogant and presumptuous can one be? I believe these kinds of trends are inevitable when one party is calling most or all of the shots over an extended period of time without a counter-balance of power to keep them honest. Regardless of party affiliation, it is human nature to grasp for power, as much power as possible. And, it is human nature to abuse power once power is attained. What excites me about the results of the November 7th election is that the counter-balance has been restored. What I discern to be dangerous emerging trends have a chance of being interrupted, and in their place an opportunity for more equal and honest dialog over the issues that will hopefully result in good public policy. I believe sound public policy that helps the most people arises out of honest dialog, exchange of differing ideas and compromise. It seems to me that the post November 7th configuration of the executive and legislative branches of government might represent a higher percentage of the population and a broader spectrum of opinion on the issues than before November 7th. The executive branch, being Republican and right of center certainly represents a huge number of Americans. Likewise, the legislative branch with the slim majority being Democrat and more left of center also represents a huge number of Americans. Three cheers for the republic! Hooray for democracy! Once again it self-corrected and counter-balanced dangerous emerging trends and has created a new possibility for meaningful dialog and relevant action among policy makers. God does not reside with a political party, but God resides in a process when the two primary parties of this country commit to sit down together, look each other in the eye, become truly involved with each other and forge public policy that serves the most Americans, especially the poorest and weakest among us. I am somewhat hopeful again, not because the Democrats gained power, but because democracy worked and better balance is restored. I will pray that our elected leaders will put the inflammatory rhetoric away and begin to do some good, solid bipartisan work for the common good and the good of the world. Who Are You Taking With You Into the Voting Booth? by Joseph Holub I would submit that none of us goes into the voting "booth" by ourselves. We all take someone(s) in with us. We all have our lists of concerns and things that we want to see accomplished in our community, country and world. When we step into the voting booth and cast a vote, we are becoming advocates. Our concerns emerge from our interaction with the world and from the values that we deem to be important to us. My take is that campaigning this "election season" has been more ugly and nasty than any that I can ever remember. I am seeing more of two campaigning techniques than I have ever seen in my lifetime. The first is the use of fear. Fear is a
very powerful factor and motivator. I must acknowledge that fear has
saved my skin more than once in my life. There are things and people
to be afraid of in this world, and a healthy sense of fear can help me
respond to those things in a way that protects me from harm.
However, I also must acknowledge that fear is ultimately irrational.
When fear takes over, it undermines clear and analytical thinking.
Fear can be used to manipulate and control. I have decided I simply will not take fear into the voting booth with me - period! My votes will be cast based on a rational study of the issues and the values that I hold dear to my heart. The second technique is the use of negative and condescending campaigning. This is no-brainer for me. I learned this in elementary school in about 1st grade observing the behavior of my classmates. Those who condescend against, and even slander others, have nothing of substantial value to offer to the common good, so all that is left is to attack the other. I become immediately suspicious of ads or candidates who use negativism as a strategy. It tells me they either have nothing to offer that is substantial and important, or they are deflecting attention away from themselves. At that point I must ask, "What is it they do not want me to know about them that they exaggerate the faults of or even slander the other? What are they hiding?" I have decided I will not cave into the deceptions of negative campaigning, and I will not take it into the voting booth with me. So who or what will I take into the voting booth with me? What are the factors that will influence my votes this year? I am seeking candidates who have a sense of the "common good" as opposed to a narrow and self-interested view of the world and issues. I am looking for people who, I conclude, have the desire and ability to build bridges and be reconcilers, as opposed to those who seek to only deepen the divisions and polarities among us. I am looking for people who do not stoop to fear and condescension to get my vote, but use common sense and clear thinking to address the issues. Because I am a person of Christian Faith, I am also taking a few of the Old Testament prophets into the booth with me. As I read the prophets I see they were most concerned about three things: Justice/fairness for the oppressed; the misuse of wealth by the rich over and against the poor; and idolatry by the wealthy and powerful that insulates them from the needs of the less fortunate and anesthetizes their sense of justice and compassion. I am also taking Jesus with me into the voting booth, especially the Jesus of Matthew 5, 6, and 7 - the Sermon on the Mount. The Jesus of Matthew 5 - 7 is a radical and passionate Jesus who, if we really take him seriously, is countercultural to many of our cherished 21st century American values: "Do not judge..." "Do to others as you would have them do to you." "Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you." "Turn the other cheek." "Go the second mile." "Whenever you pray go into your room and shut the door." "Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth." So, who are you taking taking into the
voting booth with you? The Jesus I see and encounter in the gospels is the Jesus who denied self for the sake of others; the Jesus who loved sinners and outsiders and enjoyed their company; the Jesus who risked uncleanliness by touching and associating with the unclean; the Jesus who intentionally violated the literal law when it was out of line with the spirit of God's law; the Jesus who lifted up the poor and other "second class citizens" that the self-righteous scorned; the Jesus who frequently departed from the "literal" to speak in parable and metaphor; the Jesus whose whole life was an model of humility and self-sacrifice; the Jesus who commanded that his followers "love their enemies"; the Jesus who was a straight shooter with his disciples not preaching a "prosperity gospel," but only that they would be like sheep in the midst of wolves and would have to take up their own cross for his sake; the Jesus who defined neighbor as anyone in need, not just those who look and talk like me. I believe the sin we Christians most frequently commit is that we make Jesus over to look more like us, than allowing Jesus to make us over to look more like him. In many Christian circles Jesus comes out looking more like a Pharisee than anyone else.
If I trust that Christ is present in the other, and I take the risk and open up my need, and my pain, and my confusion to the other, then I run the risk of being touched by Christ and hence transformed, if ever so little, in some way, and so does the other. Once in a while another intersects my life just at
the right moment in time who is Christ to me, or me to the other, or both
of us to each other. I am touched so deeply that my life and my journey
are profoundly altered and a sacramental event occurs. Through one
ordinary human life, I am touched by the divine. At that holy moment
in time the ordinary becomes extraordinary, and we both bask in the
presence and light of God - and are bonded as siblings in Christ.
JESUS
TRAVERSED THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED “’Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me; yet not my will but yours be done.’ In his anguish he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat became like great drops of blood falling on the ground.” (Luke 22:42, 44) I saw someone sweat blood once! I was in high school P.E. class and we were in the midst of a wrestling unit. There were two very strong kids in my class who were arch rivals. The day came when they were to wrestle each other. One of the kids had a very light complexion with platinum blond hair. The two went at it. It was more than merely a wrestling match. It was a fight for self-esteem and bragging rights. Towards the end of the match the platinum blond kid found himself in a hold that had almost pinned him to the mat. To escape, he gave it one final mighty effort to loosen the grip of his opponent. Perspiration was running off his face. Then I saw it. The sweat running down his face was pink! He was exerting himself so hard that his sweat contained blood! Luke tells us that Jesus prayed so hard that his “sweat became like great drops of blood.” Jesus went to the Mt. of Olives that last night before his crucifixion to pray. And this was no simple bed-time prayer. This was praying at the deepest depths. Before he even went to Jerusalem he knew what lay in store for him. He knew that it was inevitable that he would be killed. But he went anyway. In the garden at the base of the mount of Olive, he prayed to his Father that if it was possible for this “cup” to be removed from him may it be so. But in the end he yielded to His Father’s will. Immediately following, Judas led the authorities to Jesus, and they seized him and took him away. You know the rest of the story. When I reflect on this story, I cannot help but think of Robert Frost’s poem, The Road Less Traveled.
And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far I could To where it bent in the undergrowth I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence Two roads diverged in a wood And I took the one less traveled by And that as made all the difference. Jesus took The Road Less Traveled. Jesus chose the road that “bent into the undergrowth.” And it “made all the difference.” It made all the difference for you and me. His journey to the cross secured salvation. His journey to the cross reconciled us with God through the forgiveness of sins. His journey to the cross sets us free to be God’s people in the world. His journey to the cross was the victory of love over hate, good over evil. Which road do you most often travel in your faith journey? Do you most often opt for the beaten path, the road more traveled, the road that is free of risk and sacrifice? Or, like our Lord, do you follow him down The Road Less Traveled, the harder road of love, sacrifice and risk all for His sake, the One who took the Road Less Traveled for you?
by Joseph Holub
The other
day I heard someone attempt to argue the position that tolerance was not
a Christian value. I thought long and hard about it and I beg to
differ.
I did some research on the word tolerance and made some interesting discoveries. The English word tolerance comes from the Latin toleratus, which means "to endure or to put up with." The Latin is considered parallel in meaning with the Greek, pherein, which also means "to bear; or to put up with without giving away." When I explore and put into practice the teachings of Jesus, especially the Sermon on the Mount, toleration is a given. Think of some of the things that Jesus said in the Sermon on the
Mount: When I reflect upon these teachings, as well as others, I can only
conclude that toleration is a Christian value. Jesus was quite clear that he did not come to establish a
political kingdom that would force his values upon the masses.
Jesus said, "My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom
were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from
being handed over ..." (John 18:36) We read in Luke 4
that even when tempted by Satan in the wilderness, Jesus rejected the
idea of political messiahship. When Christianity tries to force
its way into the gears political process and confuses the kingdom with
God with an earthly political movement, it always loses its connection
with love and tolerance and surrenders to the corrupt nature of the
political process. The supreme act of tolerance in the history of humanity was Jesus willingly dying on the cross. Nobody took Jesus' life. Jesus gave his life for the sake of sinful human beings who had come to a place of disdain for him and all for which he stood. He was willing to tolerate others to the point of giving his life. His dying on the cross is a testimony that toleration is a characteristic of love. He willing "put up with" the disdain of others to the point of death. Christians are people who live within a tension or paradox. We are called to be bold witnesses, but not without humility and toleration. Toleration does not mean abdicating one's own values to the values of others. It means living boldly with a humble heart, at the same time recognizing it is a very diverse world that is in dire need of the supreme value of the Christian Faith, suffering love for the sake of others - even those we do not like, disagree with, or distain! I am a Christian and make no apologies for it. The Lord calls me to be a bold witness for the Lord Jesus Christ. I live my life as a Christian, and I relate to others out of that faith and the values that come with it, but never in a way that is coercive or condescending. The kind of love Jesus manifested in his life demands, especially when another disagrees with the precepts and values of my faith, that I not judge but turn the other cheek, and not respond in an unloving and condescending way, but always respond in a way that affirms the humanity and dignity of the other. A religion without love is a religion without tolerance; and a religion without tolerance is no religion at all, but just an excuse to disdain and hate others. The Prayer of Jabez Falls Short in Africa by David Batstone
Not everything for Wilkinson has gone according to plan, unfortunately. A page one feature in the Dec. 19 The Wall Street Journal captures the sad tale in a nutshell: "In 2002 Bruce Wilkinson, a Georgia preacher whose self-help prayer book had made him a rich man, heard God's call, moved to Africa and announced his intention to save one million children left orphaned by the AIDS epidemic. In October [2005], Wilkinson resigned in a huff from the African charity he founded. He abandoned his plan to house 10,000 children in a facility that was to be an orphanage, bed-and-breakfast, game reserve, Bible college, industrial park and Disneyesque tourist destination in the tiny kingdom of Swaziland. What happened in between is a story of grand hopes and inexperience, divine inspiration and human foibles. …[H]is departure left critics convinced he was just another in a long parade of outsiders who have come to Africa making big promises and quit the continent when local people didn't bend to their will." It is not my aim to gloat at Wilkinson's failure. To the contrary, I mourn what this means for the millions of African children in crisis who apparently will not benefit from his efforts. I also want to honor Wilkinson's desire to help the least fortunate. It would have been easy for him to take the wealth he gained from his book sales and live a life of personal comfort. This chain of events, however, should not pass without a moment of theological reflection. The "blessed life" that Wilkinson has helped to promote carries with it a number of assumptions about where God is present in the world, and how God acts in response to the prayers of the faithful. The Prayer of Jabez is based on a passage out of the book of Chronicles, in which a devoted man named Jabez asks God for a favor: "Oh that you would bless me and enlarge my border, and that your hand might be with me, and that you would keep me from hurt and harm!" The fact that God honors Jabez' prayer and blesses him with great riches indicates to Wilkinson a God-principle. If we in pure heart ask God for a blessing - and do so using the very words that Jabez prayed - then God will bring wondrous gifts into our life. As The Wall Street Journal reports, Wilkinson interprets the wild commercial success of his books (roughly 20 million copies sold combined) as yet another proof of the miraculous power of the Jabez prayer. In other words, it worked for Jabez, it worked for Wilkinson, and now it should work for you. With the fiasco in Africa now behind him - and the full Journal report makes clear that fiasco is the appropriate term - I wonder if Wilkinson has reconsidered his theology. Maybe because I spent so many years in poor regions of the globe I could never accept the prayer-in-blessing-out approach to faithful living. Straight to the point, I have known too many devoted Christians for whom life did not bring them material blessing. Their children still died of infectious diseases that plagued their village. They could not avoid the violence that dictators and ideologues so often use to cow the powerless. Their territory did not expand because their only path for survival was a daily labor with their hands. Yet they did not lose faith, or cease praying for God's blessing. As I ponder on their lives, I find a more fitting theology for God's presence and action in the world to be laid out in the book of Hebrews. There we are encouraged to have "faith in things not yet seen," and are offered models of individuals who tried to lead devoted lives that honor God. We read that some of them did receive great material blessings, while others ended up in the dens of lions or stoned due to their principled living. We learn, in other words, that God does hear their prayers and loves them profoundly, but it does not always bring them material riches or expanded territory. Wilkinson's doctrine in fact implies that social structures are immaterial. An individual reciting the right prayer can transcend an AIDS epidemic in his or her village or escape being bought and sold into slavery (like 27 million people on this planet yet today). Perhaps now that Wilkinson has immersed himself in Africa, he better understands that the curse of poverty is not a spiritual punishment, or an indication of a lack of faith. To bring blessings to the orphans and widows of Africa, a dramatic shift in values - political, economic, and personal - will be required. And that challenge cannot be owned by Africans alone; it falls squarely on the shoulders of us in rich nations, who enjoy such great material "blessings." Just like the next Bible reader, I could pick out individual passages that seem to suggest that God will give us whatever we desire as long as we ask for it with a pure heart. "You can even move this mountain" with such a prayer, as Jesus teaches his disciples in the gospels. I do not summarily discount these passages, nor do I assume that we should never pray for rain in a time of drought. But the weight of the biblical message balances heavily toward a prayer life that yields courage, love, and compassion to do the will of God. The expectation of material gain and miraculous blessings may even distract us on that pilgrimage. The passage in Hebrews calls us, based on past heroes of the faith, "to run the race in front of us," confident that devoting our lives to God's work is all the reward we will ever need.
If you're
wondering what I'm doing here, at a prayer breakfast, well, so am I. I'm
certainly not here as a man of the cloth, unless that cloth is leather.
It's certainly not because I'm a rock star. Which leaves one possible
explanation: I'm here because I've got a messianic complex.
Did God Send The Hurricanes?
by Pastor Joseph Holub "Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it's destroyed and put stress on this country." (Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans said as he and other city leaders marked Martin Luther King Day) I don't doubt that God probably is mad, or at least profoundly disappointed, in America, and a lot of other nations, for all sorts of reasons. But that's not what I want to comment upon. I want to talk about the inference Mayor Nagin of New Orleans made that God sent the Hurricanes as punishment for our national sins. God created a natural world that is guided by natural laws. Experts tell us that hurricanes come in alternating quiet and active cycles over long periods of time and that we are now in a "very active cycle." Some experts posit the correlation of global warming and the severity of hurricanes, but even those experts concede that the verdict is still very much out on that pending more research and data. It is not God punishing America so much as humanity is reaping the consequences of the potential impact of modern industrialization and technology upon the earth's climate. If there is a lesson in the hurricanes it is more along the lines of, "Why do we allow our cities to be so inadequately protected when we know such events will occur sooner or later?" The laws and statistics of climate and weather tell us that! "Why do we not take more action to address the root issues of global warming when more and more experts are telling us human technology is definitely changing the climate?" We must not side step these critical climate issues by deferring to God's wrath. It is a very dangerous thing to equate natural disaster with the will of God. It is not even good theology. The New Testament talks about a God of grace and love, who sent His Son to die on the cross to pay the penalty of our sins - not a God of wrath and condemnation who hurls hurricanes, tornados and earthquakes at humankind as a penalty for sin. If in fact what Mayor Nagin said is true, then how and who is to discern which natural disasters are from God and which are simply the result of the natural process? Were the devastating tornados of 2005 and early 2006 punishment for human sin? Was the gargantuan Tsunami of December 2004 that killed hundreds of thousands punishment for sin? We don't need God to wind up hurricanes and throw them at us like Frisbees to know what God thinks about certain things. We already know that among God's chief concerns are the plight of the poor, economic injustice, racial prejudice, war, and a host of other justice issues. The overwhelming testimony of the scriptures tell us that much. No doubt fewer hurricanes would be well received, but what we really need is leadership with the moral integrity, commitment and courage to take on these tough issues and lead us through – not deflect the issue to God’s wrath. Perhaps the bottom line is that anyone who thinks that God would do such things has a very small and a very mean God. Pastor Joseph Holub
“Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to you and eat with you, and you with me.” - Revelation 3:20 When early Christianity spoke of the return of the Lord Jesus, they thought of a great day of judgment. Even though this thought may appear to us to be so unlike Christmas, it is original Christianity and to be taken extremely seriously. When we hear Jesus knocking, our conscience first of all pricks us: Are we rightly prepared? Is our heart capable of becoming God’s dwelling place? It is very remarkable that we face the thought of God coming so calmly, whereas previously peoples trembled at the prospect. We have become so accustomed to the idea of divine love and of God’s coming at Christmas that we no longer feel the shiver of fear that God’s coming should arouse in us. We are indifferent to the message, taking only the pleasant and agreeable and forgetting the serious aspect; that the God of the world draws near to the people of our little earth and lays claim to us. The coming of God is truly not only glad tidings but, first of all, frightening news for everyone who has a conscience. Only when we have felt the terror of the matter, can we ever recognize the incomparable kindness of God. God comes into the very midst of evil and of death, and judges the evil in us and in the world. And by judging us, God cleanses and sanctifies us and comes to us with grace and love. God makes us happy as only children can be happy. God wants to always be with us, wherever we may be – in our sin, in our suffering and death. We are no longer alone; God is with us. We are no longer homeless; a bit of the eternal home itself has moved into us. One day, at the last judgment, he will separate the sheep and the goats and will say to those on his right: “Come, you blessed…I was hungry and you fed me…” (Matt. 25:34). To the astonished question of when and where, he answered: “What you did to the least of these, you have done to me…” (Matt. 25:40). With that we are faced with the shocking reality: Jesus stands at the door and knocks. He asks you for help in the form of a beggar; in the form of a ruined human being in torn clothing. He confronts you in every person that you meet. Christ walks on the earth as your neighbor as long as there are people. He walks on the earth as the one through whom God calls you, speaks to you and makes his demands. That is the greatest seriousness and the greatest blessedness of the Advent message. Christ stands at the door. He lives in the form of the person in our midst. Will you keep the door locked or open it to him? Christ is still knocking. It is not yet Christmas. But it is also not the great final Advent, the final coming of Christ. Through all the Advents of our life that we celebrate goes the longing for the final Advent of God. Advent is a time of waiting. Our whole life, however, is Advent – that is, a time of waiting for the ultimate, for the time when there will be a new heaven and a new earth, when all people are brothers and sisters and one rejoices in the words of the angels: “On earth peace to those on whom God’s favor rests.” Learn to wait, because he has promised to come. “I stand at the door…” We however call to him: “Yes, come soon, Lord Jesus!” Amen. Killing
Him Softly Given the number of people who've been "saved" these days, you'd think the world was becoming a brighter place. It could be, too, if more people would stop worrying about religion and lose themselves in service to God and each other. People like Christoph Friedrich Blumhardt (1842-1919), the maverick German pastor and religious socialist who wrote the piece below. (in italics) Blumhardt's witness influenced theological giants like Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth, but his books (mostly collected sermons and devotions) can hardly be characterized as theology -- they are too blunt, too earthy, too real. Burning away the trappings of modern piety like so much chaff, his "active expectation" of God's kingdom leads us away from ourselves and toward our fellow human beings. Blumhardt's Christ is not the bringer of a new religion (nor a political power-seeker), but a Savior whose humanity brings hope to the despondent, and whose compassionate hands reach down into the darkest places. Nowadays, unfortunately, many things are done with the idea that the more spiritual and otherworldly we are, the better. But it is just the other way round. The more we learn to seek truth and to act on it as far as possible in the situation in which God has placed us, even if that be in the dirt, the better it is. For the Savior does not want to come as an idea but as a reality, wherever people live and struggle (Matt. 18:20). It is here that we must make way for him and how can we do this except by acting in accordance with his nature? And his nature is simple, true, and genuine. Every person who is waiting for Jesus can receive a distinct impression of what is right and good (Rom. 2:12-16). Perhaps he may feel that one or the other habit he has cannot be pleasing to God. If he stops it and changes, then he is making way for the one who comes. When our hearts are set on this practical kind of waiting, God will surely guide us every step of the way. In fact, all sincere followers of Jesus will be given so much practical work to do that - if you will permit me to say so - they will hardly have time for long devotions or for sitting in church (James 1:27). Jesus has been called a founder of a new religion. But that is not God's word to the world. His aim was never to give us a new religion in order that we might live a bit more decently - in that case Moses and his law would have sufficed. With Jesus' simple command to the disciples the Savior is saying, "Don't make a religion out of me! That which I bring from God is not a religion, for all religions are rigid. They don't want to move forward, they don't intend to change. They set up shrines, they institute museums, they set up councils, and because of all this they are a stumbling block to the world." As a matter of fact - to be quite frank - our religions are a hindrance not only to the world but to the history of humanity. Nothing is more dangerous to the advancement of God's kingdom than religion. But this is what Christianity has become. Do you not know that it is possible to kill Christ with such Christianity? After all, what is more important - Christianity or Christ? And I'll say even more: we can kill Christ with the Bible! Which is greater: the Bible or Christ? Yes, we can even kill Christ with our prayers. When we approach God with our prayers full of self-love and self-satisfaction, when the aim of our prayers is to make our world great, our prayers are in vain. The Savior will not allow himself to become petrified in religion. That is why the Savior told the story of the ten virgins, some of whom were wise and others not (Matt. 25:1-13). With this, he says, "There are some who make a religion out of me, a cozy haven, a state of bliss. It is the others who will be the living Christians, always open to change, always seeking something new, until the entire world stands there renewed." Yes, we love the word of God spoken to humankind but if we truly love it, we will understand that this word is much greater than the Bible. It cannot be chained, written down as if set in cement. When God's word is frozen, even the best Christians are able to justify their hate toward their fellowmen, even killing them and vehemently separating themselves from them. Today there are Christians who believe that they will (after death or at Jesus' return) fly with the Savior to heaven and then laugh at those left behind. I find it incomprehensible that those who call themselves devout consider themselves better than others or exempt from God's judgment. This kind of religion is false because it separates us from other human beings. I will have nothing to do with it! Jesus entered right into the human condition in all its ugliness. He united with people. He did not separate himself from them.
Compelled to HIde How strange that we should ordinarily feel compelled to hide our wounds when we are all wounded! Community requires the ability to expose our wounds and weaknesses to our fellow creatures. It also requires the ability to be affected by the wounds of others... But even more important is the love that arises among us when we share, both ways, our woundedness.
To Be Poor in America "To be poor in America was to be invisible, but not after this week, not after those images of the bedraggled masses at the Superdome, convention center and airport. No one can claim that the post-Reagan orthodoxy of low taxes and small government, which does wonders for the extremely rich, also inevitably does wonders for the extremely poor. What was that about a rising tide lifting all boats? What if you don't have a boat?"
Joy and Pain
So Where Is the
Cross?
Dark Valleys of Growth Thomas Jefferson said, "Civil liberty can be established on no foundation of human reason which will not at the same time demonstrate the right of religious freedom." Jefferson also said, "I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another."Soon we will celebrate "Independence Day." I personally prefer "Independence Day" and not "4th of July." To me "4th of July" is a date, whereas "Independence Day" denotes a sacred occasion. This is the day that we especially give thanks for our incredible nation where we enjoy the greatest and most unprecedented freedoms in human history. On Independence Day I will give abundant thanks to God for our awesome nation, but not without some grave concerns. It seems as if in recent months there have been many stories in the news about what I perceive to be a growing lack of toleration between religious groups, and between religious groups and non-religious groups. Because I am a Christian and a pastor I would like to comment from the religious side of things. I get concerned when one's religious expression narrowly identifies true Christian witness with a specific political expression or stance on a specific issue. Personally, I don't find many life issues to be that simplistic or that narrow. I know sincere, conscientious and faithful Christians who fall all along the political spectrum from right to left. I know these sincere people all struggle to apply their understanding and experience of the Christian Faith to the issues of our time, often arrive at differing conclusions. I can live with that, but to carry it a step further and subsequently escalate the rhetoric to a level of mean-spirited condescension only polarizes people, causes creative exchange of ideas to cease, and sows the infant seeds of oppression. I get concerned when Christian witness becomes intrusive, coercive and condescending against other Christian expressions or other religions. I get very concerned that many attitudes are being identified as "Christian" that seem to me to be very "un-Christ-like." When I look at the ministry of Jesus I don't perceive that he was intrusive, coercive or condescending. In fact, the only people with whom he seemed to be particularly upset were the religiously self-righteous. We need to learn a lesson about witness from our ultimate mentor Jesus Christ. Jesus' witness was never mean-spirited or narrow. He met people where they were and for whom they were. He ate with "tax collectors and sinners." He never forced people and was never negatively intrusive. It is clear that the one value he brought to every situation was love and respect for the other regardless of whether they were saint or sinner, friend or enemy. The founding fathers of our nation knew the critical importance of religious freedom and toleration. Thomas Jefferson reminds us that true liberty means, on the one hand, affirming the right to be being committed to one's personal religious beliefs, but on the other hand, also affirming and respecting the right of your neighbor who may have a differing religious and political viewpoint. As Christians we are called to the mighty and awesome task of applying our faith to the issues of our day. We are all called to be conscientious and faithful public witnesses of our faith. But when our witness becomes intrusive, coercive and condescending I believe we have lost touch with the spirit and attitude of our one true mentor, the Lord Jesus Christ, who willingly went to the cross for His enemies and adversaries. We could say His cross is the most extreme display of toleration in the history of humankind. In fact, Christ went far beyond toleration, to outright unconditional love for His enemies. The underlying power and truth of His witness was suffering love, not coercion or condescension. I don't perceive many of us are very good at "loving our enemies and praying for those who persecute us," as Jesus instructed his followers in the Sermon on the Mount. But I do pray that we could at least practice toleration, and that our public witness could be loving, kind, gentle, respectful and non-condescending towards others. Happy Independence Day!
Black Hole
Frozen Anger
Justice - Mercy - Grace
Who am I? They often tell me Who am I? They also tell me Who am I? They
also tell me Am I then really all that which other men tell of? Who am I? They mock me, these lonely questions of mine.
Nothing that is worth doing can
be achieved in our lifetime; therefore we must be saved by hope.
Nothing which is true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in
any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by
faith. Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone,
therefore we must be saved by love. No virtuous act is quite as
virtuous from the standpoint of our friend or foe as it is from
our standpoint; therefore we must be saved by the final form of
love, which is forgiveness Faith is God Holding On To Me And the desire to own property, to take for ourselves things which in no way belong to us, does not stop short at the sun. The air is already bought and sold as a commodity, by health resorts. And what of water? Or waterpower? Why should the earth be parceled out into private hands? Is it any different from the sun? No; the earth belongs to the people who live on it. God intended it for them, but it has been taken over by private individuals. The word “private” comes from the Latin privar—“to steal.” Thus private property is stolen property – property stolen from God and from humankind!Jesus is the friend of humanity and therefore the enemy of private property. He wants people to have true life. He attacked the urge to self-preservation and privilege. He gave up everything and became not only the poorest but also the lowest, for he was classed as a criminal. He kept nothing back for himself. He had no money of his own: his wandering community had a common purse.
Jean Vanier We who are rich are often demanding and difficult. We shut ourselves up in our apartments and may even use a watchdog to defend our property. Poor people, of course, have nothing to defend and often share the little they have. When people have all the material things they need, they seem not to need each other. They are self-sufficient. There is no interdependence. There is no love. In a poor community, however, there is often a lot of mutual help and sharing of goods, as well as help from outside. Poverty can even become a cement of unity.
Why the World Is Upside Down
Mother Teresa of Calcutta Jesus taught us how to forgive out of love, how to forget out of humility. So let us examine our hearts and see if there is any unforgiven hurt - any unforgotten bitterness!It is easy to love those who are far away. It isn't always easy to love those who are right next to us. It is easier to offer food to the hungry than to answer the lonely suffering of someone who lacks love right in one’s own family. The world today is upside down because there is so very little love in the home, and in family life. We have no time for each other. Everybody is in such a terrible rush, and so anxious…and in the home begins the disruption of the peace of the world. If I Do That..
Soren Kierkegaard
The matter is quite simple. The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand we are obliged to act accordingly. Take any words in the New Testament and forget everything except pledging yourself to act accordingly. My God, you will say, if I do that my whole life will be ruined. Herein lies the real place of Christian scholarship. Christian scholarship is the Church’s prodigious invention to defend itself against the Bible, to ensure that we can continue to be good Christians without the Bible coming too close. Dreadful it is to fall into the hands of the living God. Yes, it is even dreadful to be alone with the New Testament. Even Though... Even though we are surrounded by death and darkness in so many literal and metaphorical ways on a daily basis, the light still shines in the darkness, and it is enough; it is the gift of all gifts; it is grace! Joseph Holub, April 14, 2005 -The day my mother died. Children Eberhard Arnold It is children who lead us to the gospel… We are not worthy to educate them. Our lips are unclean; our dedication is not wholehearted. Our truthfulness is partial; our love divided. Our kindness is not without motives. We ourselves are not yet free of lovelessness, possessiveness, and selfishness… Only wise men and saints, only those who stand as children before God, are really fit to live and work with children.
Cross-Shattered Christ
|